Skip to content
  • Start free trial
An original census record

Start a free trial to view

Get access to the original record, as well as a map showing the local area at the time

Household of James W Dalman (born 1829, Surrey)

1881 England, Wales & Scotland Census in Guildford, Surrey, England

James W Dalman and 7 other people are on this record


Get access to the original record, as well as a map showing the local area at the time

James W Dalman's household

Male

James W

Dalman

Head
Female

Elizabeth

Dalman

Wife
Male

James

Dalman

Son
Male

Henry

Dalman

Son
Female

Naomi

Dalman

Daughter
Male

William

Dalman

Son
Female

Jane H

Dalman

Daughter
Female

Emily

Dalman

Daughter
First name(s) James W
Last name Dalman
Relationship Head
Marital status Married
Age 52
Birth year 1829
Birth place Merrow, Surrey, England

Household members (8 people)

First name(s)

Last name

Relationship

Marital status

Age

Birth year

Birth place

Full record

James W

Dalman

Head

Married

52

1829

Merrow, Surrey, England

Elizabeth

Dalman

Wife

Married

47

1834

Cranleigh, Surrey, England

James

Dalman

Son

Single

24

1857

Wonersh, Surrey, England

Henry

Dalman

Son

Single

21

1860

Cranleigh, Surrey, England

Naomi

Dalman

Daughter

Single

18

1863

Cranleigh, Surrey, England

William

Dalman

Son

Single

16

1865

Cranleigh, Surrey, England

Jane H

Dalman

Daughter

Single

10

1871

Cranleigh, Surrey, England

Emily

Dalman

Daughter

Single

9

1872

Cranleigh, Surrey, England

Explore Findmypast's newspaper collections

Explore the 1881 Census and millions of historical records for free with Findmypast. Find out more about the household of James W Dalman in Guildford in 1881, and follow the Dalman family through time in other national records, newspapers and more.

We've found family trees for James W Dalman

We’ve found James W Dalman in 3 family trees. Find out more about James W Dalman's household and view the Dalman family in family trees created by Findmypast members.

Not who you're looking for?